Skip to content

12m-15m.org

Tin Tức Việt Nam – Thế Giới Lớn Nhất

  • Giải Trí
  • Công Nghệ
  • Ẩm Thực
  • Khỏe Đẹp
  • Môi Trường
  • Bất Động Sản
  • Giáo Dục
  • Khác
    • Công Nghiệp
    • Hành Chính và Dịch Vụ
    • Nông Nghiệp
    • Ô Tô, Xe Máy, Xe Khác
    • Tài Chính, Ngân Hàng, Bảo Hiểm
    • Thông Tin và Truyền Thông
    • Vận Tải
    • Xây Dựng
  • Tin HOT
  • Phim
Menu

US Supreme Court temporarily blocks New York's COVID-19 limits on houses of worship

Posted on December 30, 2020 by admin



New York’s rule that limited the number of people who could attend religious services was lifted temporarily Wednesday night by the U.S. Supreme Court.

Nguồn: https://12m-15m.org/

Xem thêm bài viết khác: https://12m-15m.org/category/phim

Posted in Phim

Post navigation

Top 2 trị tóc bạc sớm tóc trắng thành tóc đen tự nhiên vĩnh viễn bằng hành tây
Nếu Xa Nhau – Diễn Viên Cao Thái Hà & David Phạm

Related Post

  • Báo Nga sửng sốt với cách Hải quân Việt Nam dùng pháo ZiS 3 để phòng thủ bờ biển
  • CHƠI TRÒ NGƯỜI LỚN với 2 cô gái cafe võng đến TẮT THỞ vì nhìn rất NGON | Trinh sát kể chuyện | ANTC
  • Xâm hại đời thực đến mạng xã hội | VTV TSTC
  • Bài Phát Biểu Đầu Tiên của Tân Thủ Tướng Phạm Minh Chính Tin Mới Nhất | NLT
  • Vì sao nữ tiếp viên hàng không VNA dương tính với virus Corona sau 8 ngày âm tính
  • Hội nghị Trung ương 15: Xem xét, đề cử 4 chức danh chủ chốt khóa XIII | VTC Now

34 thoughts on “US Supreme Court temporarily blocks New York's COVID-19 limits on houses of worship”

  1. James Hughes says:
    December 30, 2020 at 8:54 pm

    Even The Pope disagrees with the extreme Right-Wing and life-threatening Supreme Court decision. As Pope Francis boldly wrote in the New York Times, condemning the idea that public-health measures are an assault on freedom, "Looking to the common good… means having a regard for all citizens and seeking to respond effectively to the needs of the least fortunate."

    Reply
  2. eva tripp says:
    December 30, 2020 at 8:54 pm

    Justice Gorgich is wrong he said that the descenting side was tearing apart the Constitution.( I heard this on PBS report about the ruling but couldn't leave a comment there because they shut off the comments. Anyway our Constitution states that our government is to promote the general welfare of it's citizens once we explained the Science to our Founding Fathers. I think they would agree less people congregating to sing & shout would be promoting the General Welfare of the U.S. citizens. Life is the 1st right all Americans have because no life, religious freedom doesn't mean much so during a pandemic that is killing some of us, more& more each day exponentially we as patriotic fellow Americans have a duty to sacrifice a little to save lives. One would think that the Catholic Church which proclaims it self pro- life ( at least for the unborn how about the rest of humanity outside the womb??? Also the so- called " pro- life "supreme" ??? Court. The one's that want to save the fetus & force poor women & any children she already has to stay in poverty because it's so much merciful for the children to die in a cold unheated house from hypothermia & malnutrition alone while their mother is out trying to desperately find some kind of job because the " christian conservative" republicans in congress have once again cut her food stamps.
    While a fetus at 12weeks which is the time of pregnancy of 9 out of 10 abortions the fetus is comatose state & has an undeveloped nervous system so can feel no pain. 75% of women who do have abortions are low income 50% are below the poverty line, 60% of women already have children they're trying to care for & support sometimes with little support from the man who was partially responsible for creating these children & even less from society because of " CONSERVATVE " CHRISTIAN REPUBLICANS who rather rail against abortions & gay people then speak about Jesus's real message which was: LOVE EVERYBODY even your ENEMY * which I find hard to do these days but I keep attempting to do so & sometimes suc ceeding) & help the poor, take care of the sick, pay your fair share of taxes & tithe. None of these the greedy Conservatives want to do even though it would take the reason for most abortions away. Jesus said " to those who are given much, much is expected.He also told us Thou shalt not judge, Judgement is mine said the Lord" Then he said " Beware false prophets" so maybe we are allowed to critically analyse those people who tell us tall tales to good to be true & of course thereligious who are often seen as prophets.
    One word I have not seen in the Gospels is the word CONSERVATIVE.

    Reply
  3. Joey Johnson says:
    December 30, 2020 at 8:54 pm

    He's the tyrant not the sheriffs

    Reply
  4. Benjamin Gal-Or says:
    December 30, 2020 at 8:54 pm

    \\ Who is the Winner? Media or the Supreme Court? //// Both are made of people. Both are afraid. Survival is at stack, of different types: Media to be destroyed by 4 more years, SC by out of control, subsequent instabilities, beginning domestically, expanding globally and historically. The whole world is watching with muddled suspense. We all know it is beyond the runaway horizons of healing the Union, beyond the future of our offspring, because a reversible test is not. Like a few irreversible words in biblical times, the Union was split, and the 10 tribes were consumed by the flames of history. The highest level of human intellectual courage is needed to decide right….

    Reply
  5. Miel Mani says:
    December 30, 2020 at 8:54 pm

    You know these people are so selfish. Why is it necessary to go to church when we have a deadly virus out there? You can worship at home and you can pray at home. This is not a violation of your first amendment rights– it's not! And this is a temporary situation that is not going to last forever. Again, this is incredibly selfish and egotistical.

    Reply
  6. Liliane Dubois says:
    December 30, 2020 at 8:54 pm

    Wow, all that circus and abuses because Governor Cuomo is taking measures to save people's lives! A bit overblown, isn't it? Considering facing the C19 plague reality any time soon, beyond " God will save us, I am sure"? Anyone? Just asking.

    Reply
  7. Tom Terrific says:
    December 30, 2020 at 8:54 pm

    Oh for god sake, give President Trump the win, he clearly earned it.

    Reply
  8. jen jaradat says:
    December 30, 2020 at 8:54 pm

    Up your 🖕🏼A$$ Cuomo and rotate on this . Your are the devils d!@k

    Reply
  9. Kathy Evans says:
    December 30, 2020 at 8:54 pm

    What a sore but arrogant loser… Thinking his opinion matters above the Supreme Court of the United States. Despicable human being…

    Reply
  10. Alessandro Forti says:
    December 30, 2020 at 8:54 pm

    PRITZKER NEXT?

    Reply
  11. Amye Hambright says:
    December 30, 2020 at 8:54 pm

    Yes 🙌🏻

    Reply
  12. TCB72 says:
    December 30, 2020 at 8:54 pm

    Fine print on Trump legal challenge fundraising emails says money will be used to pay campaign debt

    Campaign begs fans to fund Trump's election lawsuits, but at least half of the money will go toward paying its debt

    Reply
  13. TCB72 says:
    December 30, 2020 at 8:54 pm

    Fine print on Trump legal challenge fundraising emails says money will be used to pay campaign debt

    Campaign begs fans to fund Trump's election lawsuits, but at least half of the money will go toward paying its debt

    Reply
  14. Denis Lessard says:
    December 30, 2020 at 8:54 pm

    as a practicing roman catholic this decision appalls me. my belief has always been that the church like my government should try to protect me. all this decision does is protect the church's pocket. no attendance no money. what possible advantage could my attendance in church bring except to expose me to covid. churches like every business needs funds, i understand that, but to expose people to disease for your fiscal well being is not right.

    Reply
  15. E Walker says:
    December 30, 2020 at 8:54 pm

    Mathew 18:20 a church structure with mass attendance is not required. The Supreme Court overruled the Bible.

    Reply
  16. Zorn Casteel says:
    December 30, 2020 at 8:54 pm

    This is false framing – The ruling means he can't do the restrictions anywhere … Not just in Brooklyn. So it is not an irrelevant ruling … .. And, it's going to set a precedent for things to come.

    Reply
  17. Gary Santos says:
    December 30, 2020 at 8:54 pm

    Justice Sonia Sotomayor, joined by Justice Elena Kagan, said the majority was being reckless.
    “Justices of this court play a deadly game,” she wrote, “in second-guessing the expert judgment of health officials about the environments in which a contagious virus, now infecting a million Americans each week, spreads most easily.”

    The New York Times
    By Adam Liptak, Nov. 26, 2020

    Reply
  18. Alpha Sports says:
    December 30, 2020 at 8:54 pm

    I don't get it, is this about picking up a collection or obeying God. In the Bible it say that people of God should obey those who have rule over them meaning the government, for this pleases Him. Yet since the first time Covid19 was announced the church leaders been fighting against God's word. The governor say stay home for your own safety and you take it to the supreme court for a collection plate. America spiritually has a long, long, long way to go … it was the evangelicals who put trump in office just for money reasons. God has given everyone free will, and people been trying to take it away from you. They was to tell you how to live … there are rules but the will that God has given every man no one should rule over it …your free will is to do as you please and if it does not line up with God's will then you have to pay the price. If not obeying God is your will then you will have to pay … the same as if your will is to obey God's will, in both cases you will be rewarded. Haven't enough people died already?

    Reply
  19. TCB72 says:
    December 30, 2020 at 8:54 pm

    A recent literature review by a University of Alberta cult expert and his former graduate student paints a startling and consistent picture of institutional secrecy and widespread protection of those who abuse children in religious institutions “in ways that often differ from forms of manipulation in secular settings.”
    It’s the first comprehensive study exposing patterns of sexual abuse in religious settings.
    “A predator may spend weeks, months, even years grooming a child in order to violate them sexually,” said Susan Raine, a MacEwan University sociologist and co-author of the study with University of Alberta sociologist Stephen Kent.
    Perpetrators are also difficult to identify, the researchers said, because they rarely conform to a single set of personality or other traits.
    The findings demonstrate the need to “spend less time focusing on ‘stranger danger,’ and more time thinking about our immediate community involvement, or extended environment, and the potential there for grooming,” said Raine.
    Raine and Kent examined the research on abuse in a number of religious denominations around the world to show “how some religious institutions and leadership figures in them can slowly cultivate children and their caregivers into harmful and illegal sexual activity.”
    Those institutions include various branches of Christianity as well as cults and sectarian movements including the Children of God, the Branch Davidians, the Fundamentalist Latter-Day Saints as well as a Hindu ashram and the Devadasis.
    “Because of religion's institutional standing, religious grooming frequently takes place in a context of unquestioned faith placed in sex offenders by children, parents and staff,” they found.
    The two researchers began their study after Kent was asked to provide expert testimony for a lawsuit in Vancouver accusing Bollywood choreographer and sect leader Shiamak Davar of sexually abusing two of his dance students in 2015.
    Kent realized that although some scholars had written about sexual abuse in religion, “They had not identified the grooming process and the distinctive features of it.” After the lawsuit was settled out of court, he approached Raine to take on the project.
    “The two of us had worked on projects before (including the successful book Scientology in Popular Culture) and I knew that she wrote fluently and quickly,” said Kent. “I provided her with initial ideas and suggestions, and she did most of the writing.”
    The result is “the first of its kind to provide a theoretical framework for analyzing and discussing religiously based child and teen sexual grooming,” he said.
    One of the best-known cases of such grooming in the Catholic Church was uncovered by the Boston Globe in 2002 and dramatized in the 2015 film Spotlight. The Globe revealed that John J. Geoghan, a former priest, had fondled or raped at least 130 children over three decades in some half-dozen Greater Boston parishes.
    Eventually a widespread pattern of abuse in the church was exposed in Europe, Australia, Chile, Canada and the United States. 
    More shocking than the abuses themselves, said Raine, was the systemic cover-up that reached all the way up to the Vatican.
    “And the relocation of priests to other churches, I think that was devastating for Catholics—a major breach of trust,” she said.

    Abuse of authority

    Raine and Kent define sexual grooming as the gradual sexualization of a relationship between a person with religious authority and a child or teen, “beginning with non-sexual touching that progresses over time to sexual contact, whereby the child may not even understand the abusive and improper nature of the behaviour.”
    Perpetrators—who may include religious and spiritual leaders, volunteers, camp counsellors in religious-based camps, staff in religious schools and others associated with religious communities—prepare the child and significant adults and create the environment for the abuse, said Raine.
    In addition to gaining access to a child, they aim to earn trust and compliance while maintaining secrecy to avoid disclosure. Often by the time the abuse actually happens, the child feels they have given consent, said Raine.
    “Abusers draw not only on their positions of power and authority as adults, which is potent in and of itself, but also on assertions about God's will—the ultimate unquestionable authority for religious adherents—and a figure that can inspire fear as much as it can awe and love.”
    When abuse is disclosed, it is often met with skepticism or denial, even by the child’s family, she said.
    “Because devotion to the institution shapes social identity, especially for more devout individuals, members of a religious community may be entirely suspicious of the victim's claims, favouring instead the religious figure and his or her status and perceived credibility.”
    In some cases, an entire society may be groomed, said Raine. She points to Ireland, where “a whole nation exhibited a ‘culture of disbelief’ towards abuse claims” after widespread revelations of abuse in the 1990s: “Members may have a greater loyalty to the institution than to the abused victim.”
    In Nigeria, the researchers found that some Pentecostal pastors groomed children under the pretext of freeing them from demonic possession, using “exorcism” as a euphemism for sexual assault. The pastors were protected by “the absolute trust that the community has in them,” said Kent and Raine.
    Family members without religious authority may also exploit the family’s faith in grooming a child, using familiar religious rhetoric and convincing the child that the abuse is perfectly acceptable in the eyes of God, said Raine.
    While much of their evidence is disturbing, Raine warns against creating a “moral panic.”
    “You don't want people to start assuming that every hockey coach, priest, pastor or minister is going to try and groom and assault your child,” she said.
    “But it's important for people to understand that most sexual abuse doesn't happen because somebody abducts your child from a public park. It's usually a family member, extended family member or somebody they know in the community, whether religious or otherwise, who is most often responsible.”

    Reply
  20. phillip miller says:
    December 30, 2020 at 8:54 pm

    Right are rights. And Cuomo will always be a shit head.

    Reply
  21. Asaph Boston says:
    December 30, 2020 at 8:54 pm

    Amy Coney Barrett is a physician of no value and so are the other so called justices who blocked this in a time when Amy Coney Barrett has had the Coronavirus. One might think she learned her lesson, obviously not. Catholics and Protestants and Pentecostals, Judaism, Islamists, etc. just because they believe in God can get the Coronavirus. This isn't a matter of freedom of religion this is a matter of common sense which SCOTUS lacks. Are the justices this stupid? Obviously yes. These goblins are what they appear to be idol shepherds. Zechariah 11: 15-17.

    Reply
  22. Erlyn Freeman says:
    December 30, 2020 at 8:54 pm

    Cuomo! :YOU MAY NOW REST IN PEACE!🙏 HAVE MERCY ON YOUR SOUL!🙏

    Reply
  23. Jkaku Rinpoche says:
    December 30, 2020 at 8:54 pm

    ????? ARE CHURCHES GONNA PAY THE BILLS OF TREATMENTS AND LOST LIVES DUE THE COVID 19 ?????

    Reply
  24. GAL OCampo says:
    December 30, 2020 at 8:54 pm

    He is Not a Catholic since he profess another doctrine, not what Jesus teaches. Nothing that goes against God prospered

    Reply
  25. Geoffrey Brockmeier says:
    December 30, 2020 at 8:54 pm

    The welfare of the people has always been the alibi of tyrants.

    Reply
  26. TCB72 says:
    December 30, 2020 at 8:54 pm

    What's the difference between acne and a protestant preacher ? Acne waits till you're 14 to come on your face.

    Reply
  27. The Nech says:
    December 30, 2020 at 8:54 pm

    Why is the word "Temporary" in this video title?

    Reply
  28. Adrian Jr Roberto says:
    December 30, 2020 at 8:54 pm

    Cuomo so much crap that you spoke yesterday look how THE GOD of heaven answers you

    Reply
  29. Retro Game Hero says:
    December 30, 2020 at 8:54 pm

    Cuomo along with the other radical leftist agenda goons is a threat to democracy.

    Reply
  30. Lorraine Medina says:
    December 30, 2020 at 8:54 pm

    Shove it Cuomo!!!!!

    Reply
  31. PC GameBoy says:
    December 30, 2020 at 8:54 pm

    Good. I am a non-believer, but even i know the constitution. People have the right to worship, doesn't matter if there is a virus going around, you cannot take away people rights. lol Especially with e 99% survival rate. Also laughing at the idiots from the left getting mad at this when they just spend months rioting, protestings, and then celebrating Bidens win in the streets shoulder to shoulder, and swapping whine bottles with each other. Hypocrites.

    Reply
  32. Joe Deglman says:
    December 30, 2020 at 8:54 pm

    That dictator will be ticked off.

    Reply
  33. James Hughes says:
    December 30, 2020 at 8:54 pm

    To all the COVID 19 fear mongers, I suggest all of you self quarantine and not worry about the folks who do not quarantine. If your right we will die if your wrong, well we told you so.

    Reply
  34. I Mari says:
    December 30, 2020 at 8:54 pm

    Temporary? #FakeNews

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Theme Design & Developed By OpenSumo